Background: Risk stratification and the use of specific biomarkers have been proposed for tailoring treatment in patients with non–ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS). We investigated the prognostic importance of high-sensitivity troponin T (hs-TnT), N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), and growth differentiation factor-15 (GDF-15) in relation to randomized treatment (ticagrelor versus clopidogrel) and management strategy (with or without revascularization) in the NSTE-ACS subgroup of the Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes (PLATO) trial.
Background: The risks and benefits of long-term dual antiplatelet therapy remain unclear.
Background: There is no large report of the impact of fractional flow reserve (FFR) on the reclassification of the coronary revascularization strategy on individual patients referred for diagnostic angiography.
Background: The Fick principle (cardiac output = oxygen uptake (GraphicO2)/systemic arterio-venous oxygen difference) is used to determine cardiac output in numerous clinical situations. However, estimated rather than measured GraphicO2 is commonly used because of complexities of the measurement, though the accuracy of estimation remains uncertain in contemporary clinical practice.
Background: Clinical trials have demonstrated that the second-generation cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting stent (CoCr-EES) is superior to the first-generation paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES) and is noninferior or superior to the sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) in terms of safety and efficacy. It remains unclear whether vascular responses to CoCr-EES are different from those to SES and PES because the pathology of CoCr-EES has not been described in humans.
Background: In chronic ischemic heart disease, focal stenosis, diffuse atherosclerotic narrowings, and microcirculatory dysfunction (MCD) contribute to limit myocardial flow. The prevalence of these ischemic heart disease levels in fractional flow reserve (FFR) interrogated vessels remains largely unknown.
Background: The effect of preoperative mitral regurgitation (MR) on clinical outcomes of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is controversial. This study sought to examine the impact of moderate and severe MR on outcomes after TAVR and surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR).
High-risk percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) are becoming more prevalent as the ability to perform complex coronary interventions continues to improve. Patients for whom high-risk interventions are considered generally have severe diffuse coronary artery disease, a single last patent conduit, or significant left main disease with large territories of myocardial ischemia. In addition, these patients also typically have reduced left ventricular function (ejection fraction <25%–35%) with comorbidities that make them high risk for standard coronary artery bypass grafting. Thus, PCI is increasingly used as a viable alternative for coronary revascularization, but it too is associated with a high degree of morbidity and mortality.
Background: There is conflicting evidence on the utility of elective intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) use during high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Observational series have indicated a reduction in major in-hospital adverse events, although randomized trial evidence does not support this. A recent study has suggested a mortality benefit trend early after PCI, but there are currently no long-term outcome data from randomized trials in this setting.
Objectives: The goal of this study was to provide a systematic review comparing the long-term outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents (DES) versus coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) for unprotected left main coronary artery (UPLM) stenosis.
Invasive treatment strategies for coronary artery disease (CAD) are highly scrutinized and constantly evolving. Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery has long been the gold standard for revascularization in patients with complex CAD; however, advances in the safety and efficacy of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) have allowed interventional cardiologists to challenge the status quo and possibly expand the indications for coronary stenting. We read with interest the meta-analysis by Athappan et al. 1 reviewing the available published reports comparing unprotected left main stenting (UPLMS) in the drug-eluting stent (DES) era with CABG surgery. The analysis included 3 randomized, controlled trials and 21 observational studies that were published between 2006 and 2012. The authors selected appropriate primary (all-cause mortality, target vessel revascularization, stroke, and myocardial infarction) and secondary (major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events) endpoints and performed a thorough and statistically sound analysis. The result is a valuable contribution to the published reports that succinctly summarizes much of the available data comparing CABG surgery with PCI for UPLMS and gives clinicians a snapshot of the data, although the authors’ conclusions are slightly overstated. The report also serves to highlight the limited availability of high-quality short- and long-term efficacy and safety data on UPLMS. Unfortunately, as the authors themselves point out, including a majority of observational studies in this meta-analysis entails accepting a certain degree of heterogeneity and uncontrollable bias within the results.
Objectives: The present study aimed to establish a risk score using a simple calculation with an enhanced predictive value for major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in patients with unprotected left main coronary artery (UPLMCA) disease after the implantation of a drug-eluting stent (DES).
Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare, in a large all-comer registry, the long-term clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents (DES) for ostial/mid-shaft lesions versus distal bifurcation lesions in unprotected left main coronary artery (ULMCA) stenosis.
Objectives: This study sought to investigate the impact of left main coronary artery (LMCA) 3-dimensional (3D) bifurcation angle (BA) parameters on 5-year clinical outcomes of patients randomized to LMCA percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the SYNTAX (Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Taxus and Cardiac Surgery) trial.
In the past, the presence of >50% stenosis in an unprotected left main (ULM) trunk had been classically considered a “surgical” indication for revascularization, and only nonsurgical candidates would be considered for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
Cookies Sociales
Son esos botones que permiten compartir el contenido del sitio web en sus redes sociales (Facebook, Twitter y Linkedin, previo tu consentimiento y login) a través de sistemas totalmente gestionados por dichas redes sociales, así como los recursos (pej. videos) y material que se encuentra en nuestra web, y que de igual manera se presta y gestiona completamente por un tercero.
Si no acepta estas cookies, no podrá compartir nuestro contenido a través de los botones, y en su caso, no podrás visualizar el contenido de terceros que hayamos incrustado en el sitio.
No las utilizamos