Background—Intravascular volume expansion represents a beneficial measure against contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI) in patients undergoing elective angiographic procedures. However, the efficacy of this preventive strategy has not yet been established for patients with ST-elevation–myocardial infarction (STEMI), who are at higher risk of this complication after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). In this randomized study we investigated the possible beneficial role of periprocedural intravenous volume expansion and we compared the efficacy of 2 different hydration strategies in patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI. Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions. 2011; 4: 456-462 Published online before print October 4, 2011, doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.111.961391. Copyright © 2011 American Heart Association, Inc.
Objectives This study sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of transradial versus transfemoral access for coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with a body mass index ≥40 kg/m2. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv. 2012;5(8):819-826. doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2012.04.009. Copyright © 2012 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
Objectives This study sought to investigate the combination of transcatheter aortic valve implantation and a novel concept of stem cell-based, tissue-engineered heart valves (TEHV) comprising minimally invasive techniques for both cell harvest and valve delivery. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv. 2012;5(8):874-883. doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2012.04.010. Copyright © 2012 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
Background—The impact of incomplete revascularization (IR) on adverse outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention remains inconclusive, and few studies have examined mortality during follow-ups longer than 5 years. The objective of this study is to test the hypothesis that IR is associated with higher risk of long-term (8-year) mortality after stenting for multivessel coronary disease. Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions. 2011; 4: 413-421 Published online before print October 4, 2011, doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.111.963058. Copyright © 2011 American Heart Association, Inc.
Objectives This study sought to examine the 3-year clinical outcomes in patients treated with the Endeavor (Medtronic, Santa Rosa, California) zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES) or the Cypher (Cordis, Johnson & Johnson, Warren, New Jersey) sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) in routine clinical practice. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv. 2012;5(8):812-818. doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2012.04.008. Copyright © 2012 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
Background—We assessed geometric changes responsible for acute lumen loss at the left circumflex coronary artery (LCX) ostium after crossover stenting from the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) to the left main artery. Interventions. 2011; 4: 355-361 Published online before print June 28, 2011, doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.110.961045. Copyright © 2011 American Heart Association, Inc.
Bifurcation lesions are the most frequently approached complex coronary lesions in everyday interventional practice. Bifurcations complexity relies essentially on their very specific anatomy that is imperfectly handled by current coronary devices and, despite dedicated techniques and drug-eluting stents, percutaneous coronary interventions directed toward the treatment of bifurcations are technically demanding and require proper execution. Kissing balloon (KB) inflation was the first specific bifurcation technique to have been developed for percutaneous bifurcation interventions and continues to currently play an important role. Indeed, KB has been proposed to optimize stent apposition, improve side branch access while correcting stent deformation or distortion. Over the years, the KB technique has been deeply investigated by many different methods, from bench testing and computer simulations to in vivo intravascular imaging and clinical studies, producing a large amount of data pointing out the benefits and limitations of the technique. We sought to provide here a comprehensive overview of all those aspects. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv. 2012;5(8):803-811. doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2012.06.005. Copyright © 2012 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
Vascular complications (VCs) occur in 3% to 8% of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs). However, only a portion of patients who experience VCs bleed significantly. The aim of this study was to assess the covariates associated with the amount of blood loss in patients experiencing postprocedural VCs as well as the effect of the degree of blood loss on long-term mortality. Overall, 7,718 unselected patients who underwent PCI through femoral access were evaluated. Those experiencing VCs were identified and stratified with regard to the degree of hematocrit (HCT) decrease after the procedure. In total, 444 patients (5.8%) had VCs. Compared to those without VCs, patients with VCs were older and had more extensive co-morbidities. Severe blood loss was most frequent in those who had vascular perforation requiring surgical repair or in those who had retroperitoneal bleeding. Overall, <25% of patients with hematoma had severe blood loss. The raw 1-year mortality was doubled in patients with minimal or moderate HCT decrease and was tripled in those with severe decreases in HCT. Similarly, the rate of definite stent thrombosis was tripled in patients with VCs and moderate or severe decreases in HCT. After adjustment, only patients with VCs and the greater HCT decreases had an increased risk for death at 1 year (hazard ratio 1.80, 95% confidence interval 1.03 to 3.14). Independent predictors of severe HCT decrease included age, female gender, glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor use, and activated clotting time peak. Bivalirudin and closure devices were independently associated with less frequent severe HCT decrease. In conclusion, VCs do not entail an increased risk for death at 1 year unless associated with severe blood loss. The use of bivalirudin and closure devices seems to reduce the risk for such complications. American Journal of Cardiology Volume 109, Issue 1 , Pages 75-81, 1 January 2012. Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Background—There still remain safety concerns on surgical procedures after coronary drug-eluting stents (DES) implantation, and optimal management of perioperative antiplatelet therapy (APT) has not been yet established. Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions. 2012; 5: 237-246 Published online before print March 6, 2012, doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.111.963728. Copyright © 2012 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved.
Objectives This study sought to investigate the extent of and factors related to lumen and vessel area change in coronary arteries after total occlusion (TO) recanalization. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv. 2012;5(8):827-836. doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2012.05.004. Copyright © 2012 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
Objectives The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of the aortic regurgitation (AR) index as a new hemodynamic parameter in an independent transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) cohort and validate its application. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv. 2012;5(8):858-865. doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2012.04.011. Copyright © 2012 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
Background—The aim of the study was to compare the outcomes after placement of the everolimus-eluting stent (EES; Xience V) and the sirolimus-eluting stent (SES; Cypher) in patients with coronary artery disease. The second-generation EES is currently one of the most commonly used drug-eluting stents in clinical practice. Although it has clearly been shown superior to paclitaxel-eluting stents, its relative merits against SES have been less extensively assessed. Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions. 2011; 4: 371-377 Published online before print July 26, 2011, doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.111.963256 Copyright © 2011 American Heart Association, Inc.
Objectives This study sought to evaluate the effect of systematic data analysis and standardized feedback on treatment times and outcome in a prospective multicenter trial. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv. 2012;5(8):848-857. doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2012.04.012. Copyright © 2012 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
Manual compression for femoral artery access site hemostasis had been the standard of care until the early 1990s. At that time, 2 significant changes in clinical practice challenged the effectiveness of manual compression as the optimal hemostasis method: the use of large-bore catheters to perform coronary atherectomy, and intensive anticoagulant regimens needed for the first clinical introduction of intracoronary stents. At that time, large hematomas and other vascular bleeding complications after coronary intervention in these patients were commonplace and frustrating to most interventionalists. In parallel, several devices underwent development and final clinical approval to achieve hemostasis more directly as an alternative to manual compression. These vascular closure devices (VCDs) ushered in a new error of vascular access management that has undergone extensive clinical evaluation and scrutiny. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv. 2012;5(8):845-847. doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2012.06.006. Copyright © 2012 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
Background—The frequency, predictors, and consequences of stent thrombosis (ST) in patients with non–ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS) have been incompletely studied. We sought to investigate the incidence, predictors, and clinical implications of ST occurring within 1 year after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with NSTE-ACS. Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions. 2011; 4: 577-584 Published online before print October 25, 2011, doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.111.963884. Copyright © 2011 American Heart Association, Inc.
Cookies Sociales
Son esos botones que permiten compartir el contenido del sitio web en sus redes sociales (Facebook, Twitter y Linkedin, previo tu consentimiento y login) a través de sistemas totalmente gestionados por dichas redes sociales, así como los recursos (pej. videos) y material que se encuentra en nuestra web, y que de igual manera se presta y gestiona completamente por un tercero.
Si no acepta estas cookies, no podrá compartir nuestro contenido a través de los botones, y en su caso, no podrás visualizar el contenido de terceros que hayamos incrustado en el sitio.
No las utilizamos